Monday, May 12, 2014

On Being American. African.

A few years ago I witnessed a written exchange between two "friends." I feel justified in putting the quotes around the word friends given 1) the context- Facebook, and 2) the exchange - quite unfriendly.

The two individuals, both non-white, described themselves as "African".

I was somewhat dismayed by what would follow.

You see, the one "friend" stated that he was born (and lives) in Nigeria, the other "friend" claimed Mississippi (U.S.) as his place of birth and residence.

The Mississippi "friend" however, claimed also the title of "African" and this claim greatly offended his Nigerian "friend."

The Nigerian "friend" made it very very clear (in no uncertain terms) that he in no way considered his Mississippi "friend" a fellow "African"...period, end of story.

It was a tense dialogue that caused me some long pause and reflection.

I mean if a person/a people that are currently in Africa don't consider or accept "outsiders" as a fellow African...what's the point?

After all I too considered myself "African"...but hmmm, what to do now??
 
Since that time I have come across other similar discussions and I try not to interject too often because I know (now) how emotionally charged the discussion can become.

So here, I'm going to make a flat statement that many will likely take issue with but I believe there is a certain logic to it once given due consideration.

According to Compensatory Logic:

"Africa" and "Africans" do not yet exist.

Neither do "America"/"Americans."

Neither do "African-Americans".

Why not?

According to compensatory logic (Fuller, 2010), the only people that correctly qualify to be called any of the above have succeeded in producing "peace" in the known universe using truth, justice, and correctness. And since "peace" does NOT yet exist, the above titles can not be correctly applied to any people or persons.

In our ignorance and frustration we fight over titles and names that if asked, we can not even define.

Its time to think higher.

In the below audio Neely Fuller Jr. explains the compensatory definitions of the terms "Africa" &"America."


http://www.divshare.com/download/25538029-ab0

Towards Peace.

Eric Spann (copyright 2014)


Friday, May 2, 2014

From Chicago to Congo

..specifically, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and  "Not to be confused with the neighbouring Republic of the Congo or the People's Republic of the Congo." (wiki)
 

An ocean and worlds apart, it occurred to me while thinking about the conflicts between and among non-white people in Chicagoland and those in the "Congo" that there is an indirect but undeniable connection that bind the two.

In the "Congo" you have factions (gangs?) that have been supplied with weapons and they fight each other over territory and the naturally occurring minerals found there.

Sometimes known as conflict minerals the "conflict" has resulted in almost 6 million people dead and literally countless injured in about 16 years time...in the Congo alone! ...Ol' man Leopold II must be either jealous or proud or both...

In Chicagoland you have factions (gangs?) that have also been supplied with weapons and they too  fight each other over territory and imported, unnatural poisons incorrectly labeled as "drugs." The end result: Yet more dead and injured black people.


I admit the connection between the two places and groups is somewhat loose, but the undeniable fact is that from Chicago to the Congo, two places where the non-white populations are pretty resource poor (in terms of the control of resources) they somehow are able to acquire a seeming endless supply of weapons of mass murder.

In the first instance the "spoils of war", the minerals, get exported (stolen?) all over the world  for the manufacture of cellphones, mp3 players, and engagement rings.

In the second, I'm undecided on the "spoils of war." Maybe the irony is that there simply are none. Yet it does keep employed the coroner, the detectives, the "vice" squad, and the guy who manufactures, ships (smuggles) and sells guns.

Regardless of the seeming "looseness" of the argument,  I contend that the two - Congo and Chicago - do not occur in a vacuum ...as nothing does.




Eric Spann (copyright 2014)